Posted 2 days ago with 318 notes

(Source: hungarian, via skeptikhaleesi)

Posted 2 days ago with 34171 notes
Posted 2 days ago with 214 notes

i will not turn my face
away from the sun
just because it is burning

(Source: barahirs, via princemaedhros)

Posted 2 days ago with 1678 notes

“This is a classic tale of female betrayal,” the 27-year-old starlet told the Daily News. “I feel all women who have been wronged can relate to that because you feel so foolish, so silly for falling for it. People come up to me and go, ‘I can’t believe you got Jon Snow with three arrows!’ Are you joking? Of course she did. He betrayed her. I fully back (my character) Ygritte for those actions, 100 percent.” — Rose Leslie for New York Daily News, April 2014 (x)

(Source: northfalls, via paradisdesbilles)

Posted 2 days ago with 1100 notes

lacigreen:

thefistofartemis:

amadgirl-withablog:

deliciouskaek:

luckythinks91:

carlsaganisgayporn:

deliciouskaek:

windatyourfeels:

pengaling:

odairses:



oh, i see. ~science~. ‘cause western science totally doesn’t suck western culture’s dick or anything.



^ This is seriously me right now.
I am actually weeping for science. I am weeping for my fellow scientists.
Who the fuck spends all their time on this bullcrap?  

i’ll answer that: No. No she is not.

This blonde haired, blue eyed white woman is not the most beautiful, not even close
If by most beautiful they mean most average, beige, common etc etc
we may have something


Son this chick is so average. She so white bread with some mayo & swiss cheese on that thing. This chick is Jack Frost. This chick is the female embodiment of Glee version of IHN. She is the human embodiment of Miss Arkansas singing And I’m Telling You in ‘94. She is regular colgate toothpaste. Son.



This is some fucked up Aryan shit.

look at the author’s last name. Coincidence? I think so.

This kind of pseudo science is an embarrassment to the entire field.  From the article:
“‘Florence has all the classic signs of beauty,’ said Carmen Lefèvre of the Perception Lab at the University of St Andrews’ School of Psychology. ‘She has large eyes, high cheekbones, full lips and a fair complexion. Symmetry appears to be a very important cue to attractiveness.’”
A “fair complexion” is a “classic sign of beauty”?  According to who?  The conditioned preferences of the eurocentric researchers?   This is just some racist bullshit.  The only thing their “measurements” are proof of is that whiteness is the standard of beauty - a standard born of the idea that white people are the superior race….aka, white supremacy. Nothx.

lacigreen:

thefistofartemis:

amadgirl-withablog:

deliciouskaek:

luckythinks91:

carlsaganisgayporn:

deliciouskaek:

windatyourfeels:

pengaling:

odairses:

image

image

oh, i see. ~science~. ‘cause western science totally doesn’t suck western culture’s dick or anything.

image

^ This is seriously me right now.

I am actually weeping for science. I am weeping for my fellow scientists.

Who the fuck spends all their time on this bullcrap?  

i’ll answer that: No. No she is not.

This blonde haired, blue eyed white woman is not the most beautiful, not even close

If by most beautiful they mean most average, beige, common etc etc

we may have something

image

Son this chick is so average. She so white bread with some mayo & swiss cheese on that thing. This chick is Jack Frost. This chick is the female embodiment of Glee version of IHN. She is the human embodiment of Miss Arkansas singing And I’m Telling You in ‘94. She is regular colgate toothpaste. Son.

image

This is some fucked up Aryan shit.

look at the author’s last name. Coincidence? I think so.

This kind of pseudo science is an embarrassment to the entire field.  From the article:

“‘Florence has all the classic signs of beauty,’ said Carmen Lefèvre of the Perception Lab at the University of St Andrews’ School of Psychology. ‘She has large eyes, high cheekbones, full lips and a fair complexion. Symmetry appears to be a very important cue to attractiveness.’”

A “fair complexion” is a “classic sign of beauty”?  According to who?  The conditioned preferences of the eurocentric researchers?   This is just some racist bullshit.  The only thing their “measurements” are proof of is that whiteness is the standard of beauty - a standard born of the idea that white people are the superior race….aka, white supremacy. Nothx.

(Source: faerieclara, via face--the--strange)

Posted 2 days ago with 1962 notes

lacigreen:

thefistofartemis:

amadgirl-withablog:

deliciouskaek:

luckythinks91:

carlsaganisgayporn:

deliciouskaek:

windatyourfeels:

pengaling:

odairses:



oh, i see. ~science~. ‘cause western science totally doesn’t suck western culture’s dick or anything.



^ This is seriously me right now.
I am actually weeping for science. I am weeping for my fellow scientists.
Who the fuck spends all their time on this bullcrap?  

i’ll answer that: No. No she is not.

This blonde haired, blue eyed white woman is not the most beautiful, not even close
If by most beautiful they mean most average, beige, common etc etc
we may have something


Son this chick is so average. She so white bread with some mayo & swiss cheese on that thing. This chick is Jack Frost. This chick is the female embodiment of Glee version of IHN. She is the human embodiment of Miss Arkansas singing And I’m Telling You in ‘94. She is regular colgate toothpaste. Son.



This is some fucked up Aryan shit.

look at the author’s last name. Coincidence? I think so.

This kind of pseudo science is an embarrassment to the entire field.  From the article:
“‘Florence has all the classic signs of beauty,’ said Carmen Lefèvre of the Perception Lab at the University of St Andrews’ School of Psychology. ‘She has large eyes, high cheekbones, full lips and a fair complexion. Symmetry appears to be a very important cue to attractiveness.’”
A “fair complexion” is a “classic sign of beauty”?  According to who?  The conditioned preferences of the eurocentric researchers?   This is just some racist bullshit.  The only thing their “measurements” are proof of is that whiteness is the standard of beauty - a standard born of the idea that white people are the superior race….aka, white supremacy. Nothx.

lacigreen:

thefistofartemis:

amadgirl-withablog:

deliciouskaek:

luckythinks91:

carlsaganisgayporn:

deliciouskaek:

windatyourfeels:

pengaling:

odairses:

image

image

oh, i see. ~science~. ‘cause western science totally doesn’t suck western culture’s dick or anything.

image

^ This is seriously me right now.

I am actually weeping for science. I am weeping for my fellow scientists.

Who the fuck spends all their time on this bullcrap?  

i’ll answer that: No. No she is not.

This blonde haired, blue eyed white woman is not the most beautiful, not even close

If by most beautiful they mean most average, beige, common etc etc

we may have something

image

Son this chick is so average. She so white bread with some mayo & swiss cheese on that thing. This chick is Jack Frost. This chick is the female embodiment of Glee version of IHN. She is the human embodiment of Miss Arkansas singing And I’m Telling You in ‘94. She is regular colgate toothpaste. Son.

image

This is some fucked up Aryan shit.

look at the author’s last name. Coincidence? I think so.

This kind of pseudo science is an embarrassment to the entire field.  From the article:

“‘Florence has all the classic signs of beauty,’ said Carmen Lefèvre of the Perception Lab at the University of St Andrews’ School of Psychology. ‘She has large eyes, high cheekbones, full lips and a fair complexion. Symmetry appears to be a very important cue to attractiveness.’”

A “fair complexion” is a “classic sign of beauty”?  According to who?  The conditioned preferences of the eurocentric researchers?   This is just some racist bullshit.  The only thing their “measurements” are proof of is that whiteness is the standard of beauty - a standard born of the idea that white people are the superior race….aka, white supremacy. Nothx.

(Source: faerieclara, via face--the--strange)

Posted 2 days ago with 1962 notes
  • Me: I need to homework
  • Brain: But you don't like homework
  • Me: You make one compelling argument
Posted 2 days ago with 1589 notes
Posted 2 days ago with 6692 notes

Most men never think about patriarchy—what it means, how it is created and sustained. Many men in our nation would not be able to spell the word or pronounce it correctly. The word “patriarchy” just is not a part of their normal everyday thought or speech. Men who have heard and know the word usually associate it with women’s liberation, with feminism, and therefore dismiss it as irrelevant to their own experiences. I have been standing at podiums talking about patriarchy for more than thirty years. It is a word I use daily, and men who hear me use it often ask me what I mean by it.

Nothing discounts the old antifeminist projection of men as all-powerful more than their basic ignorance of a major facet of the political system that shapes and informs male identity and sense of self from birth until death.

—bell hooks, “Understanding Patriachy” (via heteroglossia)

(via thefemcritique)

Posted 2 days ago with 5072 notes
Home Ask Archive Credit « back